My Groups arrow Conservative Naturists arrow A DESPARATE CAMPAIGN

A DESPARATE CAMPAIGN
To post a message, please join this group!

Premium Member

ANDYbee

Posted: Oct 30, 2012

View my other posts

Panic has enveloped the zero logo regime as their surrogates reach new lows in decorum whilst demonstrating their utter contempt for the American people. The means: Send the Powderpuff President to hard-hitting interviewers like David Letterman, the ladies of The View and hip-hop radio DJ Pimp with a Limp. The goal: Avoid any dialogue regarding the economy, four years of failed policies, the deadly scandals like the Arab Spring, Fast and Furious or Benghazi. You have to be a liberal to find moral equivalency to a campaign worthy of the Oval Office. Here are just a few audacious examples from the deflating campaign to re-elect the Civility-in-Chief …


Surely Lena Dunham will vote like her lady parts depend on it as this the leftist stooge delivers the liberals’ VOTE=SEX ideal to young single women and carries the subliminal message that, to the Democrats, a woman is worth less than the sum of her reproductive parts. She is a quintessential young Hollywood liberal: Extraordinarily privileged, rich one-percenter and hatched from some left-wing pod where her guilt is salved by encouraging the government to handle everything — as long as those solutions won’t affect her.


This subliminal misogynistic message of this low brow advert definitely makes Lena Dunham expunge worthy.


Imagine an America where strip mines are fun and free
Where gays can be fixed and sick people just die and oil fills the sea
We don’t have to pay for freeways! Our schools are good enough
Give us endless wars on foreign shores and lots of Chinese stuff
We’re the children of the future, American through and through
But something happened to our country and we’re kind-a blaming you
We haven’t killed all the polar bears but it’s not for lack of trying
The Earth is cracked, Big Bird is sacked and the atmosphere is frying
Congress went home early; they did their best we know
You can’t cut spending with elections pending unless it's welfare dough
We’re the children of the future, American through and through
But something happened to our country and we’re kind-a blaming you
Find a park that is still open and take a breath of poison air
They foreclosed your place to build a weapon in space but you can write off your au pair
It’s a little awkward to tell you but you left us holding the bag
When we look around the place is all dumbed down and the long term's kind of a drag
We’re the children of the future, American through and through
But something happened to our country and yeah, we’re blaming you
You did your best you failed the test; Mom and Dad we’re blaming you!


The ммм ммм ммм Barack Hussein Obama Kids are all grown up and still being indoctrinated to sing his praises.


What can be said about a presidential campaign advert that has to be labeled NSFW? From moveon.org and Michael Moore comes this gem of senior citizens threatening violence and bodily harm which demonstrates that even nonagenarians are merely pawns in the left’s vulgar efforts to scare Americans …


Is that Barry’s illegal immigrant Aunti Zeituni promising to karung Mitt Romney’s ahlahs?


Premium Member

jimshedd112

Posted: Oct 31, 2012

View my other posts

Is this really the best the Dems have got? Sad.

Jim

Cheri

Posted: Nov 1, 2012

View my other posts

Should the Republican ticket win the Presidency, women's rights may just be gone.

smokey2

Posted: Nov 1, 2012

View my other posts

Wow...Really?! Can you defend that statement or is it "just thrown out there?"
Wow, Cheri. Got anything substantial and verifiable to back up that statement?


Premium Member

ANDYbee

Posted: Nov 2, 2012

View my other posts

Republican zombies are plotting to invade your home, rifle your medicine cabinet and confiscate your contraceptive pills! Really, they are!! YAWN. That is according to the same boorish people who every election tell citizens the GOP will force-feed Granny cat food before tipping her off a cliff in her wheelchair.

When the president’s minions began developing its general strategy for duping a majority of the voting public into re-elect him, they knew they needed to drive a lot of disenchanted female voters back onto the Democrat plantation.

Yes, the DONKEY PARTY is up to their old propaganda-scare game: Switch the issue in order to turn voters — in this case, women — against the Republicans. Nobody is trying to take away women’s reproductive rights; no Republican has even brought this subject up!

It became an issue when ъαмαscare dictated that religious institutions — specifically Catholic hospitals, colleges, and service groups — pay for contraception and abortion-inducing drugs that violate their faith; clearly unconstitutional.

They concocted the fictional Republicans’ War on Women knowing full well the government education system has long since dispensed with teaching accurate history (re: the 19th Amendment and the nearly four-decade battle against Democrat-controlled Congresses and the ɘviƨƨɘяgoяq deity President Woodrow Wilson). They also know that the more the electorate is distracted from the failure of this presidency, the better the chances Barry Benghazi will continue to slouch in the Oval Office with his feet atop the Resolute Desk.


aznative

Posted: Nov 2, 2012

View my other posts

Cheri's statement is true. Cuts to funding of not full cut off of funding to Planned Parenthood for one. No insurance coverage for contraception or women's health care. Cuts to women's health in general. I don't know the Republican plan since none has been articulated. So good they are keeping it a secret. Democrats are not evil. We just want to keep what we have worked for and is fair. I am for saving money but not at the expense of others who need it. Seniors (myself) medicare cuts (I use the Vets System) Social Security threat to privatize (I have it retired) cuts to schools, I have grand kids. Increased energy production, at what cost to the environment? Alternative energy sources research, silly. Climate change is a myth. So polar icecap melting is a myth too. So are retreating glaciers. Roe v Wade is under threat. Every imaginable roadblock to get an abortion are in place. I can attest to that for AZ. Ok let's see if you can do better with less.
Again, verifiable sources, please? Not rhetoric.

smokey2

Posted: Nov 2, 2012

View my other posts

The one thing I've noticed from our "less than conservative friends" is ...
1) Lack of facts
2) Everybody seems to have their hand out.
3) It's OK for the "other" person, i.e. taxpayer to pay for it.

Now I ask you two ... when was the last time you were in a Planned Parenthood Clinic? Or, are you worried about some "unknown" person?

Roe v Wade is already decided by the courts ... any law passed against it would be struck down.

Finally, what women's rights are we talking about? Do they have "special" rights? What are they, and who gave them these rights?

Now, if you believe women are a "protected" class, then you must believe in Gay Rights because they too are in a protected class.

I know these are tough issues, but when you throw out a statement, without backing it up, it's worthless propaganda.

I "could" say most wars are started by Democrats and point out WWII, Vietnam, Kosovo, and others ... but I KNOW that isn't a fact because I know Lincoln, the first Republican President was in Office when the Civil War started ... so, I guess what Lacy and I are asking is tell the truth and back it up with facts ... not "talking points."

Cheri

Posted: Nov 4, 2012

View my other posts

Take a look at Ryan's voting record regarding women's rights.

Look at Mitt's history of buying plants and then closing them and HIS statement that he wants to abolish funding to Planned Parenthood.

I like my Medicare as it is. Parts B&D (doctors and prescription coverage) for $58/month. I was paying $201 while on a SC state plan when I worked for the state.

I was in a Planned Parent clinic when I was in college. I have very good personal acquaintances who have been to one this past year. They do pap tests and mammographies there as well as distribute other information for women.

How come ED prescriptions won't be touched as far as being available on insurance?
Cheri, you said: "Look at Mitt's history of buying plants and then closing them and HIS statement that he wants to abolish funding to Planned Parenthood."

As for buying plants and closing them, it wasn't HIM specifically, it was Bain Capital (a private equity and investment firm, which is in the business of making money, btw). If Bain thought the struggling company could be revived, they did so (Staples, Burger King, Samsonite are examples).

As for his statement on Planned Parenthood funding: What he WANTS to do, what he WILL do, and what he CAN do are entirely different things. Congress, not the President, writes the legislation, after all. Congress is responsible for funding (or de-funding) programs.

And Ryan has said any changes to Medicare would only affect those 55 and younger. You would not be affected.

aznative

Posted: Nov 4, 2012

View my other posts

Any president sets the tone and agenda. The congress indeed does pass or not pass bills, plans of a president. The mere fact that the republicans want to cut or limit access for women's health is sexist. Hugh Hefner wrote a good piece on the republican agenda. I am 66 and set as far as SS is concerned. What is the plan in detail? Still a secret. How does Romney plan to get his change going if the congress is deadlocked as it is now with split party control? I am not for any party that takes away.

smokey2

Posted: Nov 4, 2012

View my other posts

AZ ... takes away what? What are you going to lose? Gov't wasn't formed to GIVE people stuff, it was formed to make people free. Yes, it's been "screwed up" by BOTH parties. Yet, I still hear you and Cheri talking about programs we can't pay for anymore. Then you write, "don't take from me ..." but it's OK to take from people who make 500K a year? This is what I don't/can't understand ... it's OK to take from one group and give to another as long as nobody takes from you.

At what point will ALL people look at the Govt, as they do THEIR own personal expenses and say, "we can't afford this?" Sadly, too many people feel the Govt owes them something other than what's in the Bill of Rights. We, as a country, can't continue down the road we're on. Why? Your kids, Grandkids and so on are going to be paying our debts. Unless the Dems have a way of making 16 trillion dollars soon, I don't see how we aren't bankrupt.

LaceyNudist

Posted: Nov 18, 2012

View my other posts

So, Cheri, Obamacare is going to keep healthcare costs down, huh?

I get DepoProvera injections from Planned Parenthood, and have for the past year (so I am quite familiar with them). I pay out of my own pocket because I don't have insurance. I lost my insurance when I lost my job.

I called Friday to make my December appointment, and was told staring December 1, 2012, the cost of said injection is going up. The pharmaceutical company had just notified PPH of the cost increase a few days before. Gee, that didn't take long... Within a week of the election.

So much for keeping healthcare affordable...

So much for looking out for low income women...

Cheri

Posted: Nov 18, 2012

View my other posts

Lacey, It is the drug companies who raise the prices. Medicare Advantage and all M/C prescription coverages - the drugs are more expensive than when I was under a private company, and I cannot use the manufacturers' coupons any more. My doctor & I have filled on prescription assistance paperwork to try to get help from the manufactures. In the meantime, I've stopped taking one of my asthma meds and take benadryl at night. I no longer take the Ambien CR as it is also $84 - was $13. The Singular (recently went generic) is also $84 as is the Symbicort. The Crestor I take is $42. Needless to say, my GYN and my internist supply me with samples as I could not afford my meds. I have stopped taking Activella or FemHRT as those too even though it's generic is $42. Two of my other meds I get from my M/C plan at no cost and my Lexapro is $23 for a 90-day supply. My husband's meds: 4 of his are at no cost for 90-day supplies. One of his is $84 but his doctor gives him samples. I am hoping to get my SS Disability so we can at least have $ to have decent food on the table. If I were to apply for SS now, it would be a bit less so we're trying to wait for the disability.

aznative

Posted: Nov 18, 2012

View my other posts

A country is judged how it treats its people. Not a welfare state as you think. Helping those who can't take care of themselves. Keeping the air and water pure so we can breath and stay alive. Take away jobs yes if we keep the regulations in place that help keep the air and water safe. Obama care has helped those in need. Closing the donut hole for seniors and keeping kids on their parent's insurance. Not denying coverage for preexisting conditions. As long as you don't need it we need to get rid of it. Maybe, perhaps, sometime YOU may need some of the unessential services. I want cuts to and I am a liberal social democrat and a fiscal conservative. But who gets hurt in this process? We don't know since the Republican candidates didn't tell us. Give and take is fair. So is sharing.Sorry, just raised that way. I don't like people who take things away I have worked hard for, others need only because they don't like it. It swells the budget. I need a better reason than that. Hug Hefner wrote a piece and I think you may want to read it. Not forcing you, just get another side if that is possible for you.

Premium Member

Nilo

Posted: Nov 18, 2012

View my other posts

There are some things that are UNDISPUTABLE, government does things WORSE then the private sector(military excluded). You take money out of the private sector (you and me) and give to the feds just so they can give back to us with stipulations, where is the logic in that? You get how many cents on the dollar to take care of a problem. And this health care deal where ADULTS to age 26 are mandated to be covered as children on their parents insurance, that is a JOKE! If social liberal means no common sense then we as a country are doomed.

LaceyNudist

Posted: Nov 18, 2012

View my other posts

Funny, but I've been getting Depo for awhile now. Years, actually. And for the year that I've been going to PPH, the cost has been stable.

And from: http://moneymorning.com/2012/08/05/warning-hidden-obamacare-taxes-will-cost-you-more-than-you-think/

Pharmaceutical Companies Tax: Starting last year, Obamacare specifies that a fixed amount of tax be extracted from the sale of prescription drugs. The amount rises from $2.5 billion in 2011 to $4.2 billion in 2018. Big drug companies must pay a portion of this tax based on their aggregate revenue from their brand-name drugs. You'll feel this tax every time you visit the pharmacy.

Premium Member

ANDYbee

Posted: Nov 19, 2012

View my other posts

The big misnomer regarding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is that it will provide better healthcare to more Americans. No! Its promise is to effectively make everybody prescribed to the same level of medical services, unless you are in one of the president’s favoured waiver groups — if you can afford a Cadillac, too bad; the ƨзviƨƨзяgoяq dictate you get a Yugo like everybody else. Yet, as the former speaker of the House smarmily stated, we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it. To the “lady” from a city made famous from it, the FOG is far from lifted.

Former New York Lt Governor Betsy McCaughey (née ~Ross) recently wrote an article for the New York Post regarding ъαмαscare — and with the results of this past election, this IS the law of the land; no more abstract platitudes or hyperbole.

President Obama’s re-election and Democratic gains in the US Senate end any possibility of repealing the Obama health law. It will roll out as written, imposing major changes soon on you and your family. If you are uninsured because you can’t afford it, help may be on the way; but if you are one of the 250 million Americans with coverage, there are big problems ahead. If you get your health insurance through a job, you might lose it as of 1st January, 2014. That’s when the new employer mandate kicks in, requiring employers with fifty or more full-time workers to provide the government-designed health plan or pay a fine.

Either pay to be covered or pay a fine; and the fines in the first three years are much cheaper than the policy, by design. Pay the fine and you’re legal! You’re okay; you’re in compliance. What does that do? It takes more people out of the private insurance market because the private insurance market must cease to exist for ъαмαscare to realize its ultimate dream. So New Year’s Day 2014, the employer mandate will require businesses with fifty or more full-time employees to provide the government-designed health plan or pay a fine.

The government plan adds $1.79 per work hour to the cost of a full-time employee. To compare, employers in retail and fast-food industries currently pay less than half that to cover their workers. When weighing the new cost of health insurance to the government’s mandated penalty — roughly 98¢ per work hour —employers will push workers into part-time status whilst others will opt for the fine so as to avoid the costly mandate; either way, workers risk losing their on-the-job coverage, if not their jobs outright.

Betsy McCaughey also explains that seniors or Baby-Boomers will receive less care than in the past. “Cuts to future Medicare funding [will] pay for more than half the Obama health law.” Already $716 BILLION has been cut from Medicare; the Republicans clearly explained this during the campaign but the demagoguery and besmirching from the Left obscured the truth from the naïve. That money is gone.

Hospitals will have $247 BILLION less to care for same number of seniors than if the law had not passed. Hospitals will spread nurses thinner. California nurses already are striking over the increased workloads. When Medicare cuts led hospitals to reduce nursing care in the past, elderly patients had a lower chance of surviving their stay and death rates from heart attacks rose, this according to a 2011 report by the National Bureau of Economic Research.


nautiboater

Posted: Nov 20, 2012

View my other posts

It's a very sad time when the Obama voter didn't understand the issues ... it's "all about me" :(

jime1626

Posted: Nov 20, 2012

View my other posts

My health care is provided by the VA. So, I don't have any medical insurance. I'm worried about having to pay the penalty for not having insurance. Any thoughts about this?

Premium Member

ANDYbee

Posted: Nov 20, 2012

View my other posts

Firstly, we thank and salute JIME for his dedication and service to this great nation. In 2010, the president administration promised ъαмαscare would not diminish health benefits for service families or retirees. The 9.6 million veterans and active duty personnel — those using TRICARE (the Defense Department’s health plan) or go to Veterans Affairs hospitals and clinics — were assured they would be better off under his omnipotent scheme:

If you’re in the VA or TRICARE, this will not force you to change systems … veterans would be eligible, potentially, for this health care exchange where they could select from a different set of plans and get some help in paying for their premiums depending on income levels.

—Barrack Hussein Obama II

Yet, last March the administration unveiled a plan to remake TRICARE that breaks that very promise; and that change is only part of a broader proposal that could weaken TRICARE and force many veterans into health exchanges and Medicaid. It assumes most of the three-quarters of military retirees who are eligible to receive health care through their employer would do so. However, if wealthier and healthier veterans migrate to private health plans, it will leave TRICARE caring only for veterans with lower incomes and more battle-related diseases such as traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, lost limbs and physical disabilities. More expensive and smaller group coverage will lead to even higher premiums and co-pays. Some veterans will be more adversely affected than others — this is the ‛ƨзviƨƨзяgoяq definition of fair — so the answer to the query depends on the financial and medical standings of the individual.

CLICK on this script to watch a debate regarding this issue.

All due respect Cheri, Obamacare is carving out $700 billion from Medicare for funding, not to mention that Medicare itself is a $23 trillion unsecured liability.

aznative

Posted: Dec 2, 2012

View my other posts

Where did you get the $23 trillion figure? The $700 billion that is quoted time and again is from payment to providers not beneficiaries. Much needs to be done but not at the expense of beneficiaries. I am not an advocate of the Tobacco Road mentality.

There are fewer people working mainly because there are fewer people. The number paying into the system to support those now of Social Security is something like 3 to 1. I am retired and paid into the system for myself and those who were on Social Security then. Prior to 1933 people worked til they were no longer able. Dead or not able to work. See what happened during the depression with no safety net. The government did nothing and we all suffered. My parents and grandparents lived through it and it was no picnic. Lose your job now and have the same as in '29 and see how long you last. No unemployment insurance or Social Security. Workman's Compensation of you get hurt. During the war everything was rationed.
To post a message, please join this group!